Talk:Spaniards
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spaniards article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Untitled, May 2021
[edit]“...following the military conquest of most of the new continent...”
“After the conquest of Mexico and Peru...”
The armies that defeated the Aztecs were comprised mostly by local indigenous enemies, not Europeans, resembling a civil war of sorts. In the end it was a lack of immunity to Old World diseases that wiped out a large portion of the native population, including indigenous allies, in the subsequent years and decades, rather than warfare.
It was these circumstances that allowed Westernized mestizos, who had better immunity due to their partial European ancestry and outnumbered those of European ancestry early in the colonial period, to thrive at their expense and gradually assimilated the indigenous populations across Latin America.
This was a long process and not completely carried out within the 16th century as after the fall of the Aztecs many indigenous populations dispersed across the continent were not under European rule, and remained autonomous for centuries after European colonization began and by then mestizos were the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants in European colonies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.202.192 (talk • contribs) 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Change the name to Spanish People.
[edit]Spaniard is an offensive term and the correct form should be Spanish. We have Spanish for Spain natives and Hispanic for all the Spanish speaking people so there's no need to use offensive terms. 144.178.129.245 (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you say that it is offensive? --Jotamar (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! Im Spanish and i don't know why it's offensive, could you explain it a bit further, if I may ask? 88.5.24.153 (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's not. Whenever I've seen someone claim that it is, they either don't explain the claim, or refer to false etymologies deriving it from a combination of "Spain" with some other pejorative word that ends in "-ard," such as "dullard." But that's not the actual etymology - "-ard" is just a suffix in older forms of both French and English that turns an adjective into a noun for a person who is [that adjective]. Some of those nouns are negative (like "dullard"), some are positive (like "wizard," from "wise"), and some are neutral (like "Spaniard" or "Savoyard").148.61.93.138 (talk) 02:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- It does seem like many of the words, in both English and French, with the -ard suffix are pejorative, but I agree that that isn't inherent in the suffix. Looking further at French, there's also, for example, débrouillard = "resourceful" and routard = "backpacker", "trekker". Also, names like Abelard, Bernard, Richard, etc. Largoplazo (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- It's not. Whenever I've seen someone claim that it is, they either don't explain the claim, or refer to false etymologies deriving it from a combination of "Spain" with some other pejorative word that ends in "-ard," such as "dullard." But that's not the actual etymology - "-ard" is just a suffix in older forms of both French and English that turns an adjective into a noun for a person who is [that adjective]. Some of those nouns are negative (like "dullard"), some are positive (like "wizard," from "wise"), and some are neutral (like "Spaniard" or "Savoyard").148.61.93.138 (talk) 02:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- In my entire life I've never come across a suggestion that "Spaniard" is offensive. Largoplazo (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2025
[edit]![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Spaniards. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Has enough sources. 2603:8002:BF0:14A0:9923:8634:166B:2D50 (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- You forgot to request an edit. Largoplazo (talk) 11:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)